Two short labels appear below. A5 means the five accountability reforms. R8 means the eight economic-security commitments. They are all parts of one pledge, signed by one candidate as a whole.
What this tool produces
Use this page to prepare a request for a candidate’s signature. The candidate is not joining Operation Citizen or endorsing every finding. The candidate is being asked to accept the complete pledge so citizens can verify the promise later.
You will leave with: the candidate’s name, one complete pledge containing the five accountability reforms and eight economic-security commitments, a return date, and a record showing whether the candidate signed the whole pledge, qualified the response, declined, or did not respond.
Follow the promise through the public record.
A signature proves only that the commitment was made. It does not prove that a bill was introduced, received a hearing, passed, became law, or improved citizens’ lives. Keep those stages separate so the record shows what happened and where the next decision rests.
Who is being asked—and by whom?
The pledge begins the measurement.
Record each stage only when a public document supports it. A candidate or minority Member can promise actions within that person’s control. The candidate cannot guarantee an outcome controlled by a committee, chamber, another branch, an agency, or the states.
Check who controls the next decisionInspect the source and legal limits for each expectation
Legal distinctions and sources
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995): states may not add qualifications for service in Congress; the pledge therefore uses the constitutional route for a binding term limit and identifies the separate personal promise.
- National Archives: constitutional amendment process: proposal and ratification are distinct steps; the President has no constitutional role in the amendment process.
- Constitution Annotated, Article I, section 5: each chamber determines its rules, the route used here for single-purpose and germaneness commitments.
- House Ethics Committee: financial disclosure: current disclosure duties are distinct from the broader ownership and trading restriction proposed in the pledge.
- FEC campaign-finance guides: corporations may not make treasury contributions to federal candidates, but may sponsor separate segregated funds.
- FEC summary of Citizens United v. FEC: the decision concerns corporate independent expenditures and electioneering communications; it did not remove the ban on corporate contributions to candidates.
- FEC: presidential public financing: public financing exists for eligible presidential candidates; a broader system would require a separate legal design.
The 1994 Contract with America is retained as a precedent for a short list of scheduled, measurable legislative acts. Operation Citizen tracks consideration, passage, enactment, implementation, and citizen outcomes separately so a procedural milestone is not presented as a complete policy result.
This form records proposed policies and candidate commitments. It does not certify enactment, constitutionality in every formulation, fiscal effect, or policy outcome. Verify the office, election, candidate, current text, and controlling law before use.