Duties Lifted

Operation Citizen · Companion evidence record

Duties Lifted

Twenty federal regulations were switched off by the 119th Congress without any vote on the rule itself. Most relieved a private party of a duty it had owed the public; where the enacted text names no one who loses a protection, this page records that rather than filling it in. This is the list, with who stopped having to comply and who was left carrying it.

42documented 119th Congress actions affecting federal rules
22Congressional Review Act disapproval laws, each with a separate recorded vote
20appropriations restrictions inside funding laws, without a separate vote on the affected rule
52%the share visible in the list of public laws

Both instruments can stop a federal rule from operating, but they do so differently. A CRA disapproval receives its own recorded vote and statutory consequence. An appropriations restriction may block implementation for the covered funding period without a separate vote on the rule itself.

The test

Follow the asset, not the invoice

A firm being paid does not make a law industry-serving — every appropriation ends up as somebody’s revenue. The question this instrument asks instead is narrower and harder to argue with:

When the provision takes effect, who holds the asset, and who bears the risk?

A duty lifted from a private party with no money changing hands is the purest case. Nothing appears in any budget. Nobody is appropriated anything. A cost that used to sit on a balance sheet moves onto the public.

Operation Citizen coding standard — Case 3

All twenty provisions below are that case. None of them spends money. Each removes an obligation somebody owed.

What was lifted, and from whom

Twenty distinct rules, carried on appropriations bills of the 119th Congress

Cost-bearer is taken from the nullified rule’s own stated purpose. Where the enacted text names no party who loses a protection, the cell reads “not stated” rather than being filled in.
ProvisionThe duty liftedWho bore the cost
119-75 §632SEC rules requiring disclosure of corporate political and trade-association spendingInvestors
119-75 §735Any requirement that federal contract offerors disclose political contributionsThe public, which loses disclosure of contractor political spending
119-75 §619FTC completion of the interagency nutrition principles for food marketed to childrenChildren targeted by food marketing
119-37 §775FDA long-term population-wide sodium reduction targets for food manufacturersConsumers the targets were written to protect
119-37 §735FDA produce safety rule of 27 Nov 2015 and the agricultural water standards, as applied to named cropsConsumers of wine grapes, hops, pulse crops and almonds
119-37 §752New FDA rules on Listeria monocytogenes for low-risk ready-to-eat manufacturersConsumers of low-risk ready-to-eat foods
119-37 §726Stocking-variety requirements of the USDA rule Enhancing Retailer StandardsSNAP participants, who lose access to a broader stock of staple foods
119-37 §736USDA school breakfast rules limiting substitution of a vegetable subgroup for required fruitChildren receiving school breakfasts
119-74 §433Clean Air Act Title V permits for greenhouse gases from livestock operationsPeople living near those emissions
119-74 §434Mandatory greenhouse-gas reporting for manure-management systemsNot stated
119-74 §435Regulation of lead content in ammunition and fishing tackle under the Toxic Substances Control ActPeople and wildlife exposed to lead
119-74 §430EPA emission standards for small remote incinerators, 40 CFR pt. 60 subpts. CCCC and DDDDAlaska residents exposed to those emissions
119-37 §728USDA regulations creating new user fees under 31 U.S.C. 9701Taxpayers, who fund what the fees would have recovered from regulated parties
119-75 div. B §510The unique health identifier standard under §1173(b) of the Social Security ActNot stated
119-75 §413Surface Transportation Board filing fees for rate and practice complaintsNot stated
119-74 §534ITAR export licensing for Category I firearms components shipped to CanadaNot stated
119-74 §537Implementation of the Arms Trade TreatyNot stated
119-74 §530DOJ and DEA enforcement against authorised industrial hemp researchNot stated
119-37 §737Federal enforcement against transport, processing and sale of lawfully grown hempNot stated
119-75 §7046§907 of the FREEDOM Support Act restriction on assistance and financingNot stated

Twelve of the twenty name a party who loses a protection on the face of the enacted text. Eight do not, and are recorded that way rather than argued into the column.

The first three concern who paid for the campaign. Congress used its spending power to stop the Securities and Exchange Commission from requiring companies to disclose political spending to their own investors, and to stop the federal procurement system from requiring it of contractors bidding for public money. Neither rule costs the Treasury anything. Both were switched off inside a bill about funding the government.

Why the count is forty-two and not twenty-two

Two instruments, one effect

A Congressional Review Act disapproval is a public law with a number. It requires a recorded vote on the rule itself, and under 5 U.S.C. §801(b)(2) the agency may never reissue the rule in substantially the same form. Twenty-two were enacted. They are easy to find and easy to count.

An appropriations restriction uses a different mechanism. It appears inside the enacted funding law rather than as its own disapproval law. Members may vote on the debate terms and the combined vehicle without receiving a separate vote on the restricted rule. The restriction ordinarily blocks the covered funds for the stated period; it does not by itself erase the underlying regulation. A later funding law may renew it.

Counting only the disapprovals shows only slightly more than half of the deregulation the 119th Congress actually carried out. That is the reason this page exists: not because the riders are hidden in any conspiratorial sense — they are printed in the enacted text, and every citation above will take you straight to one — but because nothing in the ordinary record adds them up.

The wider pattern

What 103 public laws contain

Coded from the enacted text of P.L. 119-4, 119-37, 119-74, 119-75, 119-86 and H.R. 6500 as enrolled. Excludes 106 housekeeping riders — travel limits, network filters, reprogramming notices — which change nothing outside government.
The 119th CongressCount
Public laws enacted — what Congress publishes103
Discrete policy actions those laws contain395
Actions carried inside six appropriations vehicles298
Actions visible as their own public law97
Removals — a protection, payment or duty taken away87
Removals carried inside a vehicle rather than passed alone60

If the count of actions looks higher than it should, that is the finding rather than an error. One hundred and three is what Congress publishes. Three hundred and ninety-five is what it did.

Two things this page does not claim

It does not claim these were slipped in. The House Appropriations Committee reported all twelve fiscal-year 2026 bills between June and September 2025, each with a published committee report, and the riders tested here were in the reported text. H. Rept. 119-215 carried the lead, livestock and incinerator provisions; H. Rept. 119-272 carried the Arms Trade Treaty and drug-enforcement provisions. They were examined by Appropriations — though not by the committees that own the underlying statutes. The Toxic Substances Control Act and the Clean Air Act belong to Energy & Commerce, which saw neither.

It does not claim a rule was broken. Legislating on a spending bill is barred by House Rule XXI clause 2, and the special rule for each of these bills waived all points of order against provisions in the bill. That is how the provisions travel — but such waivers are ordinary. The Congressional Research Service records Rule XXI clause 2 among the most frequently waived House rules, and in one Congress 146 of 187 special rules waived all rules of the House outright. The waiver is the mechanism, not a violation, and this page treats it as procedure rather than as scandal.

What is left after both concessions is the finding: nineteen federal rules were switched off, no member voted on any of them, and the ordinary record does not add them up.

How to check this

Method

Every number is a count of enacted text, not of a summary of it. The full text of each act was retrieved from govinfo, its divisions and sections extracted, and each substantive provision classified by who holds the asset once it takes effect. Provisions printed twice under different headings are counted once. Housekeeping riders are counted separately and excluded from the totals.

The procedural record — referral dates, committee reports, markups, hearings, and the text of each special rule — comes from the Congressional Bill Status bulk data for the 119th Congress, all 16,090 measures, and from the enacted text of the rules themselves.

To verify a single line: take the citation in the left-hand column, open that public law on govinfo, and read the section. That is the entire method, and it is the reason every figure here carries one.